Explain aquinas cosmological argument essay

Explain the Strengths and Weaknesses of Aquinas’ Cosmological Argument

If it is removed, the light ceases. Hume believed that the idea of the necessary being was incoherent and illogical.

The German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz made a similar argument with his principle of sufficient reason in His disciple Proclus stated "The One is God". Also, he questioned the relation between causes and effects and that every event has a cause.

Thus, according to Aquinas, there must have been a time when nothing existed. This argument focuses on the theory that if the universe exists then something must have caused it to existence, ie.

Hume labelled this idea illogical as the God Aquinas described was a being out of touch and indifferent to the universe he apparently caused.

Cosmological argument

Aquinas continued this argument to say that nothing can be a cause of itself. Hume questioned the necessity of claiming the whole universe has a cause just because it can be explained by a chain of causes.

This argument states that because everything in the universe is contingent and dependant on something else for its existence, the universes explanation leads back to something non-contingent. Now to take away the cause is to take away the effect. This makes the cosmological argument a strong argument to support as helps explain the reason why the universe is constantly changing.

Therefore, if there be no first cause among efficient causes, there will be no ultimate, nor any intermediate cause. In esse essence is more akin to the light from a candle or the liquid in a vessel.

Another strength is due to the argument being an a posteriori argument and it being from everyday experience of the universe. Correspondingly, the motions of the planets are subordinate to the motion inspired by the prime mover in the sphere of fixed stars.

Hume pointed out that calling God a cause made him seem like he belonged with all the other finite beings. Now in efficient causes it is not possible to go on to infinity, because in all efficient causes following in order, the first is the cause of the intermediate cause, and the intermediate is the cause of the ultimate cause, whether the intermediate cause be several, or only one.

The ideas on cause and effect, motion and change and contingency are clear and easy to follow making it comprehendible and easy to support. His response to this is that the argument provided no proof for events having causes and as humans, we never actually experience causation therefore providing an argument against the first and second way which Aquinas produced.

However, If the universe never had a beginning then there indeed would be an actual infinite, an infinite amount of cause and effect events.

This required a "self-originated motion" to set it in motion and to maintain it. This means that the being which created the niverse must have been external to it and also must be a necessary being, aka, must have always existed. In other words, our experience of the universe aids our understanding that certain aspects of the universe have specific purposes and exist for specific reasons which gives strong support for this argument.

Aquinas stressed that all events that happened had a cause and must either be infinite or have its starting point in a first cause. Hence, the Universe had a beginning.


Once it is built, the builder walks away, and it stands on its own accord; compare the watchmaker analogy. There were five proofs which he came up with but his three ways are commonly used as the cosmological argument for the existence of God.

He argued that the fact of existence could not be inferred from or accounted for by the essence of existing things, and that form and matter by themselves could not originate and interact with the movement of the Universe or the progressive actualization of existing things.

How to Write a Summary of an Article?In natural theology and philosophy, a cosmological argument is an argument in which the existence of a unique being, generally seen as some kind of god, is deduced or inferred from facts or alleged facts concerning causation, change, motion, contingency, or finitude in respect of the universe as a whole or processes within it.

- Aquinas’ Cosmological Arguments The Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, as propounded by Thomas Aquinas, is also known as the Third Way.

It is the Third of Five ways in Aquinas's masterpiece, "The Summa" (The Five Ways). Essay Marking Credit; Events; Teachers; Philosophy Cosmological Argument.

Tutors and online course available now. Tutoring and Online Course for A level students, with both content and training in A grade writing skills. More info. Praise for Peped “I’m just so grateful without your site I would have crumbled this year”.

a) Explain the strengths and weaknesses of Aquinas’ cosmological arguments. The cosmological argument is an a posteriori argument based on the question of the relation of the universe’s existence and God’s existence.

The five ways are: argument for an unmoved mover, argument for an uncaused causer, argument from contingency, argument from gradation and argument from teleology. It is the first three that support the cosmological argument to explain the existence of God.

Free Essay: Explain Aquinas’ Cosmological Argument The basis of the cosmological argument is that the universe cannot account for its own existence. There.

Explain aquinas cosmological argument essay
Rated 3/5 based on 64 review